Most people notice something in the first two or three sessions, and not just in thinking, but in how they're actually responding. The chemistry call itself tends to be clarifying in ways people don't expect.

Resilience training builds general capacity on top of whatever is already there. This works at the level of what's actually driving the specific pattern. It's more precise and usually faster because it starts with the mechanism, not the coping strategy.

Yes. Multi-session programmes designed for a specific group are often where this work is most effective. We'd start with a conversation about what the cohort is navigating and build from there. A four-week format spread across the semester is something I've designed for.

Coaching, not therapy. Sessions are forward-focused and goal-oriented. If something comes up that needs therapeutic depth, I'll tell you and refer you to the right person. That boundary is part of how I work.

Yes, and often a particularly good fit. The approach leads with mechanism and evidence. Researchers tend to get a lot from it precisely because they already understand the science but are missing the bridge between knowing it and applying it to themselves. I've been in that gap.

Yes, most coaching happens online. Clients across Europe and internationally. Group facilitation can also run fully online and it works well in that format.